Skip to content
Investmentportfolio

Portfolio Rebalancing Calculator

The trades that return a portfolio to its target weights, with a band so small drifts are left alone and an option to rebalance with new money instead of selling. Selling to rebalance realises gains, which is a cost the drift often does not justify.

Also called: rebalance portfolio, portfolio drift calculator.

%

Only trade a holding once it has drifted this far from its target.

How to rebalance
Value to trade
₹1,50,000

₹1,50,000 of trading brings the portfolio back to its targets. 2 of 3 holdings have left the 5% band. The rest are close enough that trading them would cost more than the drift. Selling the overweight holdings realises gains on them. Check the tax before trading, and consider directing new contributions instead.

Portfolio value
₹10,00,000
Largest drift from target
10%
Holdings outside the band
2
To buy
₹50,000
To sell
₹1,00,000
On the band
2 of 3 holdings have left the 5% band. The rest are close enough that trading them would cost more than the drift.
On the method
Selling the overweight holdings realises gains on them. Check the tax before trading, and consider directing new contributions instead.
On costs
Trades are shown gross. Brokerage, spreads and capital gains tax come out of the proceeds and are not deducted here.

An estimate, not an offer or a guarantee. Projected returns assume the rate you entered holds for the whole term, which no market does.

Current against target

Hover or drag for values
Current %Target %

What to trade

HoldingCurrentCurrent %Target %DriftTradeAction
Equity₹6,00,00060%50%10%₹1,00,000Sell
Debt₹2,50,00025%30%-5%₹0Inside band
Gold₹1,50,00015%20%-5%₹50,000Buy
Method and background

This is what the calculation gives for the numbers you entered. It is an estimate, not advice, and it knows nothing about your situation beyond those numbers. Rules for India change on a published schedule; the effective date is shown on every rule-based tool.

How this is calculated

Rebalancing is arithmetic on shares of a whole: each target weight applied to the total gives the value that holding should carry, and the difference is the trade. The band is what stops this becoming a treadmill, since a holding two points off target costs more in spreads and tax to correct than the drift is worth. Directing new money at the underweight holdings does the same job without a sale, which matters where a sale is a taxable event, and the page shows when new money alone is not enough to close the gap rather than pretending it is.

each holding is traded to the difference between its target share of the whole portfolio and what it currently holds
w_k
Target weight
V
Portfolio value including new money
v_k
Current value of the holding

Worked examples

Each of these is asserted on every build. If a change to the engine ever moved one of these answers, the build would fail before the page could print it.

equity has run ahead of its target

Current value of each holding
600000, 250000, 150000
Target weight of each holding, in percent
50, 30, 20
Names for the holdings
Equity, Debt, Gold
Rebalancing band
5%
New money to invest
₹0
How to rebalance
Sell the overweight, buy the underweight

Value to trade₹1,50,000

equity is 60% against a 50% target on a 1,000,000 portfolio, so 100,000 comes out

Open this example

the band leaves small drifts alone

Current value of each holding
510000, 295000, 195000
Target weight of each holding, in percent
50, 30, 20
Names for the holdings
Equity, Debt, Gold
Rebalancing band
5%
New money to invest
₹0
How to rebalance
Sell the overweight, buy the underweight

Value to trade₹0

boundary: every drift is inside the 5 point band

Open this example

Method and limits

What it assumes

  • Target weights are given as percentages and are scaled to sum to a hundred if they do not.

What it deliberately does not model

  • Trading costs, bid-ask spreads and capital gains tax are not deducted from the trades shown.
  • Fractional units may not be tradeable, so real trades will round.
  • Rebalancing back to target is a discipline, not a return-maximising strategy.

Formula version 1.0.0 · definition 1.0.0 · India · Report a problem with this calculator

Frequently asked questions

How often should I rebalance?
Most evidence points to once a year, or whenever a holding leaves its band, whichever comes first. Rebalancing more often adds cost and tax without improving the outcome measurably.
Why rebalance with new money?
Because a sale realises capital gains and a purchase does not. If you are still contributing, directing contributions at the underweight holdings closes the gap without a taxable event.