This is what the calculation gives for the numbers you entered. It is an estimate, not advice, and it knows nothing about your situation beyond those numbers. Rules for India change on a published schedule; the effective date is shown on every rule-based tool.
How this is calculated
The ratio of ending to starting value, raised to one over the years. That is the constant rate which would have produced the same result, and it is a smoothing: two investments with identical CAGR can differ enormously in volatility. Contributions break the simple formula, because money added in year four did not compound for five years, so the growth component is separated out. Inflation converts the nominal rate into the real one, which is what says whether purchasing power grew.
Worked examples
Each of these is asserted on every build. If a change to the engine ever moved one of these answers, the build would fail before the page could print it.
two and a half times over five years
- Starting value
- ₹1,00,000
- Ending value
- ₹2,50,000
- Years
- 5
- Added each year
- ₹0
- Inflation over the period
- 0%
- Largest fall along the way
- 0%
CAGR20.11%
the fifth root of 2.5 less one, against the 30 that division gives
Open this examplecontributions inflate the headline rate
- Starting value
- ₹1,00,000
- Ending value
- ₹2,50,000
- Years
- 5
- Added each year
- ₹20,000
- Inflation over the period
- 0%
- Largest fall along the way
- 0%
CAGR20.11%
boundary: only half the increase was growth, the rest was money added
Open this exampleMethod and limits
What it assumes
- No withdrawals, and contributions made at the start of each year where entered.
What it deliberately does not model
- CAGR ignores the path entirely, so it hides volatility and drawdown.
- With irregular cash flows XIRR is the correct measure rather than this.
- A CAGR over a short period is dominated by the start and end dates chosen.
Formula version 1.0.0 · definition 1.0.0 · India · Report a problem with this calculator
Frequently asked questions
- Why is CAGR lower than total return divided by years?
- Because compounding does the work. A 150 percent gain over five years is 20.1 percent a year, and dividing gives 30, which overstates by ten points.
- Does CAGR account for money I added?
- The simple formula does not, and it overstates when you did. Money added in year four compounded for one year, not five, which is why the growth component is separated here.